Xtra Smileys
[Open]
Flame Damnation
May 23, 2022, 09:03:19 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News:   
 
 
  Home Help Arcade Gallery Links Login Register  

Who Really is the Serial Sex Monster?

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Print  
Author Topic: Who Really is the Serial Sex Monster?  (Read 34 times)
caskur™
Swing Voter
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 11001


Tortured Artist


« on: July 31, 2010, 12:48:04 pm »
Reply with quoteQuote

He only got 10 YEARS.... what a disgrace... the follow up to the Gary Narkle story.

______________________________

http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/garry-narkles-crimes-over-38-years-revealed-in-district-court/story-e6frg12c-1225899119894

Garry Narkle's crimes over 38 years revealed in District Court

THE District Court today heard full details of Garry Narkle's convictions stretching back 38 years. In his sentencing remarks, Justice Eaton told the court:

"YOUR offending began at a very young age with appearances initially in Narrogin in the Children’s Court.

Your first appearance in superior court was in the Supreme Court on 27 October 1972 at the age of 17 years.  Having been convicted of two counts of breaking, entering and stealing and two of robbery with violence in company, you were sentenced to a term of eight years’ imprisonment with a direction that you serve a minimum of four years before being eligible for release on parole.

An appeal against sentence succeeded in the Court of Criminal Appeal and in February of the following year, the sentence was reduced to a requirement that you serve two and a half years’ imprisonment before being eligible for release on parole.


Having been released from prison, you continued to offend, being convicted in mid-1975 in the Perth Court of Petty Sessions of a range of offences and sentenced to further terms of imprisonment.  You continued to offend intermittently throughout the 1970s.

In April of 1980 and again on two occasions in February of 1982, you were convicted of aggravated assault on a female.  The first of those convictions attracted a term of six months’ imprisonment and the latter attracted fines of $100 each.

In August 1982, you were found guilty in this court of one count of abducting a female under the age of 16 years and two counts of unlawful carnal knowledge of that complainant.  You were sentenced again to terms of imprisonment.  Again, you appealed and in November of 1982, the Court of Criminal Appeal allowed the appeal and reduced the sentence imposed upon you.


In 1985, you were convicted in the Supreme Court of Perth of two counts of ****, one of deprivation of liberty and one of breaking and entering with intent.  Again, you were sentenced to terms of imprisonment, being required to serve a minimum term of three years and six months before being eligible for release on parole.

In September 1990, you were again convicted in the Supreme Court of Western Australia at Perth on two counts of aggravated sexual assault and one of deprivation of liberty.  You were sentenced to an aggregate term of 10 years’ imprisonment.

Following your release, there were several minor offences followed in this court in March of 2000 with convictions for deprivation of liberty, assault with intent to commit a crime and assault occasioning bodily harm.  You were  sentenced to a total term of seven years’ imprisonment on that occasion, being denied eligibility for parole.

Following your release from that term, there were further minor convictions in February 2005.

In September 2007 in the Perth Magistrates Court, you were convicted of indecent assault and sentenced to a term of eight months’ imprisonment.  Again, you were successful on appeal in the Court of Criminal Appeal in February of 2008 and the sentence imposed was set aside; in lieu thereof, a sentence of six months and two weeks’ imprisonment suspended for four months was imposed.
During the latter part of 2008, you were convicted of several minor offences, one involving possession of amphetamines, and you were fined in each case.

The offences for which you must now be sentenced occurred in January of the following year, 2009.  They are convictions on all counts, as I said earlier, in Perth indictment 36 of 2010, they being for sexual penetration without consent in the case of counts 2, 4, 5 and 6 and for unlawful and indecent assault in the case of counts 1 and 3.  The maximum penalty provided by law for the former is 14 years’ imprisonment and for the latter, five years’ imprisonment.''
Report Spam   Logged


Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Reply  |  New Topic  |  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Bookmark this site!
Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy